File 007

Ten Bizarre Wars Fought Over Ridiculous Things

Some wars start over empires and ideologies. Others start over a pig in a potato patch or a looted pastry shop. This file collects ten bizarre wars fought over ridiculous things, from a shootout over a farm animal in the Pacific Northwest to a military campaign against flightless birds. The trouble is that many of the funniest versions online are inflated or simply invented. So every entry gets a verdict: confirmed when the war and its odd trigger are documented, debunked when the popular story falls apart.

  1. C
  2. C
  3. C
  4. D
  5. C
  6. C
  7. C
  8. C
  9. D
  10. C
  • 8 confirmed
  • 2 debunked

Each square is one case, stamped with its verdict. How we decide verdicts

Opened October 12, 202622 sources
Case 1 of 10San Juan Island, Washington1859–1872

The Pig War

On June 15, 1859, an American settler named Lyman Cutlar found a pig rooting in his garden on San Juan Island and shot it. The pig belonged to the Hudson's Bay Company, the British trading firm that also claimed the island. Both the United States and Britain said the San Juan Islands were theirs, because an 1846 treaty had drawn the border through a channel without saying which channel.

When British officials threatened to arrest Cutlar and remove American settlers as trespassers, the US Army sent Capt. George Pickett with 64 soldiers. Britain answered with warships. By the end of August, 461 Americans were dug in with 14 field cannons and eight heavy naval guns, facing a growing squadron of British warships offshore. Rear Adm. Lambert Baynes refused to land troops, reportedly saying he would not drag two great nations into war over a squabble about a pig.

Gen. Winfield Scott negotiated a joint military occupation, and British and American camps shared the island for about 12 years. In 1872 the dispute went to Kaiser Wilhelm I of Germany, whose arbitration commission ruled for the United States on October 21. According to the National Park Service, which runs the site, the only casualty of the entire standoff was the pig.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedNational Park Service records document the shooting, the troop buildup and the 1872 arbitration, and agree that no soldier died.

Sources (1)
Case 2 of 10Veracruz, Mexico1838–1839

The Pastry War

A French pastry cook known only as Monsieur Remontel claimed that Mexican army officers had ransacked his shop in Tacubaya, near Mexico City, during the unrest of the late 1820s or early 1830s (accounts differ on the year). Mexican sources say the officers had simply run up a tab. Either way, Remontel took his complaint to King Louis-Philippe of France.

His grievance was bundled with other French claims, and in 1838 France demanded 600,000 pesos in damages. When Mexico would not pay on French terms, a French fleet under Rear Adm. Charles Baudin blockaded the Gulf ports. In late November 1838 the French shelled the fortress of San Juan de Ulúa, which guarded Veracruz, and then took the city.

The war's strangest casualty was a leg. Gen. Antonio López de Santa Anna rushed to Veracruz, was hit by grapeshot in a skirmish with the French rear guard, and had his leg amputated. He later had it buried with military honors, and the wound helped revive his political career. With British diplomats brokering a deal, Mexico agreed to the 600,000 pesos and French forces left in March 1839. The pastry shop gave the war its nickname, but the real issues were unpaid debts and France's push for trade concessions.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedThe blockade, the bombardment and the 600,000-peso settlement are well documented; the pastry claim was real but only one of many French grievances.

Sources (2)
Case 3 of 10Caribbean and the American Southeast1739–1748

The War of Jenkins' Ear

In April 1731, Spanish coast guards stopped the British brig Rebecca in the West Indies. Its captain, Robert Jenkins, later said a Spanish officer sliced off part of his ear during the search. Spain had been cracking down on British smuggling, and Jenkins's ship was reportedly carrying contraband sugar.

The story sat for years until 1738, when opposition politicians brought Jenkins before a committee of the House of Commons and he displayed what he said was the severed ear. It became a rallying symbol for members of Parliament who wanted to push Prime Minister Robert Walpole into a fight with Spain. Britain went to war in October 1739.

The ear was the spark, not the cause. Underneath were trade rights in Spanish America, smuggling and a border dispute between the young colony of Georgia and Spanish Florida. The fighting reached American soil: Gen. James Oglethorpe's 1740 siege of St. Augustine failed, and in 1742 his forces turned back a Spanish invasion of St. Simons Island at the Battle of Bloody Marsh. A huge British assault on Cartagena, in present-day Colombia, collapsed in 1741, with disease killing more men than combat. The conflict then merged into the larger War of the Austrian Succession, which ended in 1748.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedBritannica and Georgia historians confirm Jenkins displayed his ear to Parliament and the war followed, though trade disputes were the real cause.

Sources (3)
Case 4 of 10Emilia-Romagna, Italy1325

The War of the Bucket

The legend is irresistible: soldiers from Modena sneak into rival Bologna, steal an oak bucket from the town well, and thousands die in the war that follows. Modena still displays a battered wooden bucket in its town hall, and the story appears on nearly every list of silly wars.

The war was real. Modena and Bologna sat on opposite sides of the long feud between the Ghibellines, who backed the Holy Roman Emperor, and the Guelphs, who backed the pope. In 1325 Modena seized the Bolognese castle of Monteveglio, and Bologna declared war. In November 1325 the two armies met near Zappolino. Bologna fielded a far larger force, roughly 30,000 men against about 7,000, yet Modena's troops routed them in a short, bloody battle. Casualty estimates vary, but most put the dead and wounded in the low thousands.

The bucket came after the fighting, not before. Victorious Modenese soldiers carried one off from a Bolognese well as a trophy. It was kept for centuries in Modena's Ghirlandina bell tower and now sits in a small room of the Palazzo Comunale. The poet Alessandro Tassoni turned the episode into a mock epic, The Rape of the Bucket, published in 1622, which helped fix the bucket in popular memory as the cause.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedThe war and the Battle of Zappolino were real, but historians agree the bucket was a post-battle trophy, not the reason for the fighting.

Sources (3)
Case 5 of 10Ohio and Michigan1835–1836

The Toledo War

Ohio and the Michigan Territory both claimed a strip of land along their border of roughly 468 square miles, including the port town of Toledo at the mouth of the Maumee River. The confusion went back to the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which defined a boundary running due east from the southern tip of Lake Michigan. Old, flawed maps and competing surveys produced competing lines.

In 1835 both sides sent militia toward the strip. Michigan's territorial governor, Stevens T. Mason, still in his early twenties, signed a law making it a crime for Ohio officials to act there. Ohio Gov. Robert Lucas created Lucas County and sent surveyors to re-mark the line. Michigan men chased off the surveyors, and a few shots were fired over their heads. The one notable injury came in July 1835, when a man named Two Stickney stabbed a Michigan deputy sheriff, Joseph Wood, in Toledo. Wood survived.

President Andrew Jackson sided with Ohio. Congress passed a compromise that Jackson signed on June 15, 1836: Ohio kept Toledo, and Michigan got statehood plus the western Upper Peninsula. Michiganders grumbled about trading a port for frozen wilderness, but the peninsula turned out to hold rich copper, iron and timber. Michigan became the 26th state on January 26, 1837.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedMilitias mobilized and one deputy was stabbed, but no one died; Congress settled the boundary in 1836.

Sources (2)
Case 6 of 10Missouri–Iowa border1839

The Honey War

Missouri and the Iowa Territory disagreed about where one ended and the other began. Missouri's constitution relied on a line surveyed by John C. Sullivan in 1816, but an 1837 resurvey put the border several miles farther north, handing Missouri a strip of land that Iowa considered its own. Much of the argument turned on which rapids in the Des Moines River the original description meant.

Tax collectors brought it to a head. When Missouri officials tried to collect taxes in the disputed strip, the sheriff of Van Buren County, Iowa, arrested the sheriff of Clark County, Missouri. According to the story that gave the war its name, Missouri agents also cut down three bee trees, hollow trunks full of wild honey, as a form of payment. Settlers on the frontier prized that honey, and Iowans were furious.

In late 1839 both governors called out militia, Lilburn Boggs in Missouri and Robert Lucas in Iowa. Several hundred Iowa volunteers reached a camp at Farmington, but the confrontation fizzled before anyone fought, and the two sides agreed to let federal authorities decide. The U.S. Supreme Court settled the matter in Missouri v. Iowa in 1849, siding with Iowa and fixing the boundary on the old Sullivan line, which surveyors then marked with iron posts.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedThe militia standoff, the sheriff's arrest and the 1849 Supreme Court ruling are documented; the bee trees are part of the standard account.

Sources (2)
Case 7 of 10El Salvador and HondurasJuly 1969

The Football War

In June 1969, El Salvador and Honduras played a series of World Cup qualifying matches. Fans were attacked, riots broke out, and the deciding game was moved to Mexico City, where El Salvador won 3 to 2. Within weeks the two countries were at war, and the press called it the Football War, or the Soccer War.

Soccer was the match that lit the fuse, not the fuel. El Salvador was small and crowded, and many thousands of Salvadorans had moved into Honduras to farm. A Honduran land reform program in the 1960s excluded people not born in Honduras, and Salvadoran settlers were pushed off land and expelled. Tensions over migration, land and borders had been building for years.

On July 14, 1969, El Salvador bombed targets in Honduras and sent troops across the border. Honduras struck back at Salvadoran military and oil facilities. The Organization of American States brokered a ceasefire that took effect on the night of July 18, which is why the conflict is also called the 100 Hour War. It was short but not trivial: the UK National Archives puts the dead in the thousands, most of them civilians, and tens of thousands of Salvadorans were forced to return home. A formal peace treaty was not signed until October 30, 1980, in Lima.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedThe war and the qualifying matches are real, but historians agree the causes were land and migration; the games were the final provocation.

Sources (2)
Case 8 of 10Zanzibar (now Tanzania)August 27, 1896

The Anglo-Zanzibar War

Sultan Hamad bin Thuwaini of Zanzibar died suddenly on August 25, 1896. Within hours his nephew Khalid bin Barghash moved into the palace and declared himself sultan. Britain, the dominant power in Zanzibar, preferred a different candidate and ordered him to stand down. Khalid barricaded himself in the palace with about 2,800 defenders.

The British ultimatum expired at 9:00 a.m. on August 27. Two minutes later, Royal Navy ships began shelling the palace. The bombardment set the building on fire, silenced its guns and sank the royal yacht Glasgow, the closest thing Zanzibar had to a navy. The firing stopped at roughly 9:40. Counts of the duration vary from about 38 to 45 minutes, which is why it is usually called the shortest war in recorded history.

Short does not mean bloodless. About 500 of Khalid's defenders were killed or wounded, many in the fire, while a single British sailor was wounded. Khalid escaped to the German consulate and was smuggled out to German East Africa. Britain installed its preferred sultan, and Khalid's supporters were ordered to pay for the shells fired at them. The episode ended any real independence Zanzibar had left for decades.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedContemporary records confirm a bombardment of under an hour, with about 500 Zanzibari casualties and one British sailor wounded.

Sources (2)
Case 9 of 10Isles of Scilly, England1651–1986

The 335 Years' War

The story goes like this. In 1651, during the English Civil War, Dutch Admiral Maarten Tromp declared war on the Isles of Scilly, a Royalist stronghold off the tip of Cornwall whose privateers had been raiding Dutch ships. Parliament's forces took the islands that summer, everyone went home, and nobody ever signed a peace. In 1985 a local historian, Roy Duncan, asked the Dutch embassy about it. On April 17, 1986, the Dutch ambassador visited the islands and the two sides cheerfully declared peace, ending a war of 335 years without a shot fired.

The 1986 ceremony really happened. The war almost certainly did not. Historians point out that Tromp was an admiral, not a government, and accounts disagree about whether he had any authority to declare anything. Scilly was part of England, not a sovereign state that could be at war on its own. And England and the Netherlands made peace in 1654 at the end of the First Anglo-Dutch War, which would have covered any quarrel involving the islands.

Even the Atlas Obscura and Historic UK write-ups that popularized the tale note that the declaration's validity is in doubt. What survives is a charming bit of local publicity, not a centuries-long state of war.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedThe 1986 peace ceremony was real, but no valid declaration of war between sovereign parties appears to have existed.

Sources (3)
Case 10 of 10Western AustraliaNovember–December 1932

The Great Emu War

In 1932, an estimated 20,000 emus moved into the wheat belt around Campion, Western Australia, trampling crops and opening gaps in fences that let rabbits through. Many of the farmers were World War I veterans, and they asked the government for machine guns. Defence Minister Sir George Pearce agreed, on the condition that the farmers supply food, lodging and ammunition costs.

Maj. G.P.W. Meredith of the Royal Australian Artillery arrived with two soldiers, two Lewis guns and 10,000 rounds. The emus did not cooperate. They scattered into small groups whenever the guns opened up, a gun jammed during one ambush, and a truck-mounted gun could not hit anything on the rough ground. After bad press, the troops were pulled out on November 8, sent back on November 13, and recalled for good in December. Meredith reportedly compared the birds to tanks for their ability to absorb fire.

Meredith claimed 986 confirmed kills using 9,860 rounds, plus about 2,500 birds he believed later died of wounds. Historians treat those figures as likely inflated. What clearly worked better was a bounty system: in a six-month stretch of 1934, farmers claimed 57,034 emu bounties. The government turned down later requests for military help, and the emus are still there.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedThe military cull really happened and largely failed; Meredith's kill counts are his own and probably exaggerated.

Sources (2)

Look closely at almost any silly war and you find a serious grievance wearing a funny hat. The pig, the pastry and the ear were never the point; they were simply the story people found easiest to tell.

Which case is the strangest?

Cast your vote to see how everyone else ruled.

Think you'd ace the quiz?

Try the History Trivia Questions on our sister site, QuizPlays.

Play the quiz

Pass this file along

Know someone who'd argue with a verdict?